Flooding Hazards, Prediction & Human Intervention

♠ Posted by amsran in Flooding Hazards,Prediction & Human Intervention at 10:39 PTG

FLOOD HARAZRD

FLOOD

Hazards Associated with Flooding

Hazards associated with flooding can be divided into primary hazards that occur due to contact with water, secondary effects that occur because of the flooding, such as disruption of services, health impacts such as famine and disease, and tertiary effects such as changes in the position of river channels. Throughout the last century flooding has been one of the most costly disasters in terms of both property damage and human casualties. Major floods in China, for example, killed about 2 million people in 1887, nearly 4 million in 1931, and about 1 million in 1938 The 1993 flood on the upper Mississippi River and Midwest killed only 47 people, but the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers estimates the total economic loss at between 15 and 20 billion dollars (Click HERE for U.S. Army Corps' web site).

Primary Effects
Again, the primary effects of floods are those due to direct contact with the flood waters. As seen in the video last lecture, water velocities tend to be high in floods. As discharge increases velocity increases.

• With higher velocities, streams are able to transport larger particles as suspended load. Such large particles include not only rocks and sediment, but, during a flood, could include such large objects as automobiles, houses and bridges.
  
  
• Massive amounts of erosion can be accomplished by flood waters. Such erosion can undermine bridge structures, levees, and buildings causing their collapse.
  
  
• Water entering human built structures cause water damage. Even with minor flooding of homes, furniture is ruined, floors and walls are damaged, and anything that comes in contact with the water is likely to be damaged or lost. Flooding of automobiles usually results in damage that cannot easily be repaired.
  
  
• The high velocity of flood waters allows the water to carry more sediment as suspended load. When the flood waters retreat, velocity is generally much lower and sediment is deposited. After retreat of the floodwaters everything is usually covered with a thick layer of stream deposited mud, including the interior of buildings.
  
  
• Flooding of farmland usually results in crop loss. Livestock, pets, and other animals are often carried away and drown.
  
• Humans that get caught in the high velocity flood waters are often drowned by the water.
  
  
• Floodwaters can concentrate garbage, debris, and toxic pollutants that can cause the secondary effects of health hazards.
  

Secondary and Tertiary Effects Remember that secondary effects are those that occur because of the primary effects and tertiary effects are the long term changes that take place. Among the secondary effects of a flood are: Disruption of services - Drinking water supplies may become polluted, especially if sewerage treatment plants are flooded. This may result in disease and other health effects, especially in under developed countries. Gas and electrical service may be disrupted. Transportation systems may be disrupted, resulting in shortages of food and clean-up supplies. In under developed countries food shortages often lead to starvation. Long - term effects (tertiary effects)- Location of river channels may change as the result of flooding, new channels develop, leaving the old channels dry. Sediment deposited by flooding may destroy farm land (although silt deposited by floodwaters could also help to increase agricultural productivity). Jobs may be lost due to the disruption of services, destruction of business, etc. (although jobs may be gained in the construction industry to help rebuild or repair flood damage). Insurance rates may increase. Corruption may result from misuse of relief funds. Destruction of wildlife habitat. Predicting River Flooding Floods can be such devastating disasters that anyone can be affected at almost anytime. As we have seen, when water falls on the surface of the Earth, it has to go somewhere. In order to reduce the risk due to floods, three main approaches are taken to flood prediction. Statistical studies can be undertaken to attempt to determine the probability and frequency of high discharges of streams that cause flooding. Floods can be modeled and maps can be made to determine the extent of possible flooding when it occurs in the future. And, since the main causes of flooding are abnormal amounts of rainfall and sudden thawing of snow or ice, storms and snow levels can be monitored to provide short-term flood prediction.

Frequency of Flooding In your homework exercise you will see how flood frequencies can be determined for any given stream if data is available for discharge of the stream over an extended period of time. Such data allows statistical analysis to determine how often a given discharge or stage of a river is expected. From this analysis a recurrence interval can be determined and a probability calculated for the likelihood of a given discharge in the stream for any year. The data needed to perform this analysis are the yearly maximum discharge of a stream from one gaging station over a long enough period of time. In order to determine the recurrence interval, the yearly discharge values are first ranked. Each discharge is associated with a rank, m, with m = 1 given to the maximum discharge over the years of record, m = 2 given to the second highest discharge, m = 3 given to the third highest discharge, etc. The smallest discharge will receive a rank equal to the number of years over which there is a record, n. Thus, the discharge with the smallest value will have m = n. The number of years of record, n, and the rank for each peak discharge are then used to calculate recurrence interval, R by the following equation, called the Weibull equation: R = (n+1)/m

A graph is then made plotting discharge for each year of the record versus recurrence interval. The graph usually plots recurrence interval on a logarithmic scale. An example of such a plot is shown here for the Red River of the North gaging station at Fargo, North Dakota. A best-fit line is then drawn through the data points. From the best-fit line, one can determine the discharge associated with the a flood with a recurrence interval of say 10 years. This would be called the 10-year flood.

For the data on the Red River, above, the discharge associated with the 10-year flood is about 12,000 cubic feet per second. Similarly the discharge associated with a flood with a recurrence interval of 50 years (the 50-year flood) would have a discharge of about 21,000 cubic feet per second. The 100 -year flood would have a discharge of about 25,000 cubic feet per second.

Note that for the Red River data, shown above, the April 18, 1997 flood had a discharge of 30,000 ft3/sec, which is equivalent to a 250-year flood. Also note that a flood that reached a similar stage occurred on the Red River in Fargo in the year 1887, only 110 years before. Does this make the statistical analysis unreliable? The answer is no. As we shall see, it is possible to have two 100-year floods occurring 100 years apart, 50 years apart, or even 2 in the same year. The probability, Pe, of a certain discharge can be calculated using the inverse of the Weibull equation: Pe = m/(n+1) The value, Pe, is called the annual exceedence probability. For example, a discharge equal to that of a 10-year flood would have an annual exceedence probability of 1/10 = 0.1 or 10%. This would say that in any given year, the probability that a flood with a discharge equal to or greater than that of a 10 year flood would be 0.1 or 10%. Similarly, the probability of a flood with discharge exceeding the 100 year flood in any given year would be 1/100 = 0.01, or 1%. Note that such probabilities are the same for every year. So, for example, the probability that discharge of the Red River at Fargo, North Dakota will exceed 25,000 ft3/sec (the discharge of the 100-year flood) this year or any other year would 1%. You can think of this in the same way you would think about rolling dice. The probability on any roll that you will end up with a six, rolling only on die, is 1 in 6 or 16.67%. Each time you roll that one die the probability is the same, although you know that it is possible to roll two or three sixes in a row. Thus, it is important to remember that even though a 250-year flood occurred in Fargo in 1997, there is still a 1% probability that such a flood, or one of even greater magnitude, will occur this year.

Flood Hazard Mapping
Food hazard mapping is used to determine the areas susceptible to flooding when discharge of a stream exceeds the bank-full stage. Using historical data on river stages and discharge of previous floods, along with topographic data, maps can be constructed to show areas expected to be covered with floodwaters for various discharges or stages.

In constructing such maps aerial photographs and satellite images of prior floods are studied to help to determine the areas that would be covered. The illustration above shows a possible hazard map based on estimated discharges or river stages for a hypothetical 10-year flood, 50-year flood, and 100-year flood. In addition, scale models are often constructed of areas prone to flooding. Such models only work if they are kept up to date with current flood prevention structures and drainage modifications. Monitoring the Progress of Storms If factors such as amount of rainfall, degree of ground saturation, degree of permeable soil, and amount of vegetation can be determined, then these can be correlated to give short-term prediction, in this case called a forecast, of possible floods. If a forecast is issued, then a flood warning can be communicated to warn the public about the possible extent of the flood, and to give people time to move out of the area. Such forecasts are very useful for flooding that has a long lag time between the storm and the peak discharge. Flash floods, which characteristically have short lag times, are more problematical. Thus, in some areas known to be susceptible to flash floods, a flash flood warning is often issued any time heavy rainfall is expected because there is always the chance of a flash food accompanying heavy rainfall.

In conjunction with the National Weather Service, various agencies in the U.S. provide information on the internet that forecast potential floods. For example - http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=DIUS,DIUS:2006-22,DIUS:en&q=flood+forecasts. Human Intervention Humans can modify the landscape in many ways. Sometimes humans attempt to modify drainage systems to prevent flooding, but sometimes these efforts have adverse effects and actually help to cause flooding in other areas. Any modification of the landscape has the potential to cause changes in the drainage system, and such changes can have severe consequences. Channel Modifications Humans often decide that a stream should flow along a specified path for such reasons as flood control, enhancement of drainage, control of erosion, increasing access to the floodplain for development, or improvement of the appearance of the channel. Such channel modifications involve measures such as the straightening the channel, deepening or widening the channel, clearing vegetation from the banks, or lining the channel with concrete. These modifications are referred to as channelization. In order to control floods, channel modification should involve increasing the channel cross-sectional area, so that higher discharge will not increase the stage of the river. Straighter channels also allow higher velocity flow and, enable the stream to drain faster when discharge increases. Lining the channel with concrete provides a smoother surface over which the water can flow, thereby reducing friction and also increasing the velocity of the stream. While channelization for flood control may reduce the incidence of flooding in the channelized area, it often results in more severe flooding both upstream and downstream from the channelized area.

Channelization can also interfere with the natural habitat of the stream system and decrease the aesthetic value of the stream. Channelization, or any other modification of a stream system, changes the validity of all historic data collected over the years on that stream. During flooding of the Mississippi River in 1973 and 1993 water levels rose to higher levels than expected from the statistical data, because modification of the stream had made the data invalid. The 1973 flood caused damage and rose to levels that might be expected from a 200-year flood, even though discharge was only at a level predicted for a 30-year flood. Thus, it appears that modifications of the drainage system had an adverse effect. Effects of Development on Flood Hazard Whenever humans modify the landscape in any way changes are to be expected in the way water drains from the land. Unless careful consideration is given to the possible drainage consequences, such landscape modifications can result in higher incidence of flooding. Development on floodplains should therefore be undertaken only with great care. Existing developments that have enhanced flooding problems are often costly to fix. Among the factors that enhance the flood potential are:

Channelization - As noted above, most channelization is undertaken to reduce flood hazards. But, channelization is also undertaken to allow development on the floodplain.

If the channelization results in decreasing the cross-sectional area of the stream, as in the example above, then the same discharge that may not have produced flooding prior to channelization, may overflow the banks and cause extensive flooding after channelization. Subsidence - As noted in previous lectures, subsidence often results in developed areas due to compaction of the sediment, both due to the increasing weight of structures and hydrocompaction associated with the lowering of the water table. Any time the elevation of an area is lowered, it becomes subject to collection of more water, and in severe cases, could drastically change the drainage pattern. Storm Sewers - In order to collect run off from streets, parking lots, and buildings, all of which block the infiltration of water into the soil, storm sewers are installed to provide underground drainage of the surface. While this may prevent local flooding of streets, it moves water more rapidly to the major stream systems and thus decreases the lag time and increases the peak discharge of the streams collecting the runoff from the storm sewers.

Reduction of infiltration - Any time the surface materials of the Earth are covered with impermeable materials like concrete, asphalt, or buildings, the infiltration of water into the soil is prevented. Urbanization tends to reduce infiltration, and thus water must collect in storm sewers and eventually in the main drainage systems. Thus, extensive urbanization also decreases the lag time and increases the peak discharge even further. Urbanization can therefore lead to a higher incidence of flash floods.

Organized Response to Flood Hazards
Response to flood hazards can be attempted in two main ways: An engineering approach, to control flooding, and a regulatory approach designed to decrease vulnerability to flooding.

• Engineering Approaches
  

• Channel modifications - As discussed above, channelization. can enlarge cross-sectional area and thus create a situation where a higher stage is necessary before flooding. In other words by enl

FROM : Prof. Stephen A. Nelson. Tulane University. Natural Disasters
http://www.tulane.edu/~sanelson/geol204/floodhaz.htm